Podcast Episode 7 – The Early Dating of the Gospels

Early Dating of the Gospels

Skeptical scholars date the Gospels 40-60 years after the death of Jesus. If that’s the case, can they be reliable sources if they are so late after the events? As it turns out, there’s one main reason skeptics date the Gospels late, and it isn’t a very good reason. There are 13 different lines of evidence to think the Gospels were written well before 65 AD that I lay out in this show. References: 84 Reasons Why We Know Luke Was a Travelling Companion of Paul – isjesusalive.com. Is Bart Ehrman Right When He Says Half of Paul’s Letters are Forgeries? – CapturingChristianity.com The Reliability of Acts (Video) – Dr. Tim McGrew How We Know … Read more

Episode 6: the Mirror or the Mask? An Interview With Dr. Lydia McGrew

In my first ever podcast interview, I interview scholar Dr. Lydia McGrew regarding her upcoming book Liberating the Gospels from Literary Devices, which comes up December 10th and can be pre-ordered at Amazon.com. The book has been positively reviewed by noted Christian scholars like Peter J. Williams, JP Moreland, and Craig Blomberg. She is a widely published analytic philosopher, specializing in formal and classical theory of knowledge, testimony, and the philosophy of religion. She received her Ph.D. in English from Vanderbilt University in 1995. She is the author of the widely acclaimed Hidden in Plain View: Undesigned Coincidences in the Gospels and Acts (DeWard, 2017), which defends the reliability of the New Testament using a long-neglected argument from … Read more

Episode 4 – 18 Passages That Prove Bart Ehrman Wrong: Mark Believes Jesus is God

Bart Ehrman says that Mark has a much lower Christology than John does. Since Mark is the first gospel to be written, there’s some obvious legendary development that happened. But is that really true? Here I go over 18 different passages that show that Mark had just as high of a Christology as John. NOTES: Does the Gospel of Mark Present Jesus as God? – Michael J. Kruger 18 Passages From Mark’s Gospel That Prove That Mark Had a High Christology Bart Ehrman Stumbles Upon the Deity of Christ – Brant Pitre asks Erhman about the deity of Christ in Mark The Case for Jesus (book) – Brant Pitre Erik ManningErik is a Reasonable Faith … Read more

Podcast Episode 3 – Debunking Jesus Mythicists’ Mishandling of Josephus

When Christians are asked where Jesus is mentioned outside of the New Testament, many of them will reply that Josephus mentions Jesus twice. But some ‘Jesus-Mythicists’ will claim that isn’t true. Here I interact with some of the mythicists, notably the popular YouTuber Godless Engineer and investigate if they’re really looking at the Josephus text fairly. Links and other References: Video: Why Josephus Doesn’t Prove the Historicity Of Jesus || Did Jesus Exist – Godless Engineer (Warning – there’s a bit of profanity in the video) Book: Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth – Dr. Bart Ehrman, an agnostic Biblical scholar Book: The Jesus Legend: A Case for the Historical Reliability … Read more

How the miracle-ministry of the apostles debunks the legendary development hypothesis

Some skeptics say that Jesus was nothing but an obscure, itinerant peasant preacher. How on earth did he become viewed as Israel’s Messiah and the Son of God? After all, why should anyone pay attention to a Messiah who was little more than a vagabond teacher who got himself crucified?  Enter miracle stories. The gospel writers invented them to turn Jesus into more than just preacher of parables. So they transformed him into a figure that outdid Moses, Elijah, and Elisha combined in terms of working wondrous deeds. To do that, they invented legends of him performing impressive healings and miracles in front of big crowds.  The problem with this legendary development theory is it … Read more